Tag Archives: transportation

Meet the Parklet

Special article by Alexandra Reisman for Union Square Main Streets

Parklets, quite simply, are very tiny parks with seating. They often provide outdoor space for nearby cafés and restaurants, bike racks, planters, and other amenities. This kind of small-scale project has successfully enhanced public space in other communities and could prove beneficial for Union Square too. Behold:

A parklet in San Francisco’s Noe Valley. 

The first parklet in Southern California opened very recently on Long Beach’s Retro Row.
Philadelphia’s first parklet, opened in 2011 in the University City neighborhood. Movable furniture and other materials make it so that parklets can be installed first as a temporary trial or only on a seasonal basis.

These cozy, inviting pedestrian niches have been carved out of car parking space—typically one parklet equals two former parallel parking spaces. The annexation of parking space makes the parklet a thrill and a novelty for many. What was previously an unmemorable slot for a car (usually hosting just one or two shoppers) may now be a lively common space for many neighborhood residents and patrons. So, though it’s actually a relatively minor intervention, the parklet symbolizes a much larger movement in which cities aim to be more walkable and pedestrian-friendly, and therefore less car-oriented.

 San Francisco has led the parklet movement since 2009. This is its first parklet outside the Mojo Café on Divisadero Street, originally a 6-month pilot project. The café provides daily maintenance for the parklet, though seating and bike parking is open to the public.

 

San Francisco’s second parklet. 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course, removing car parking in a business district, for any purpose, always raises at least a few eyebrows and often invites criticism. After all, car parking is important for accommodating patrons from other parts of the city or the suburbs. This is especially so in Union Square, which is increasingly a destination for people from outside of the neighborhood and, though fairly well served by buses, still awaits the Green Line.

Yet, for the price of a few lost parking spaces, a well-placed parklet can do a lot of good. By providing seating, some pleasant greenery amid the urban grey, and a semi-protected space, it becomes an “outdoor room,” not merely an extension of the sidewalk. It invites people to linger, making a whole block more convivial. And its location on the street encourages cars to slow down, making the area feel safer and more comfortable to pedestrians.

This one’s neat: another San Francisco parklet. 

Conviviality and walkability benefit businesses by making the whole business district a more desirable place to be. As the urban scholar William Whyte meticulously observed, “People tend to sit most where there are places to sit,” and, relatedly, “What attracts people most, it would appear, is other people.” And because people want to be where they not only can rest, but also where they feel safe and welcome, the design and placement of a parklet are vital for its success. A parking space that has been merely cordoned off wouldn’t, by itself, do the trick, but it does provide 120 square feet of newly usable public space that can be developed in myriad ways.

Check out some photos from international PARK(ing) Day for examples of some of the versatile ways people are using parking space. On this day people feed parking meters to reserve the spaces for non-car uses like lawn games, yoga, or a mini café.

This past fall the parking space on Bow Street in front of Bloc 11 cafe was reclaimed for a large bicycle rack and reception was positive.  We’re anticipating the bike rack to return this spring.  Maybe we can do something even more ambitious this summer with a full on parklet.

Where in Union Square do you think a parklet would work best? What amenities would you like to see?

Want to learn more?

An article about “the most adorable urban space to come along in a long time.”

San Francisco’s Pavement to Parks initiative

PARK(ing) Day

A classic in the field of study on how people use public space, William Whyte’s “The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces”

 

Transportation Survey from MassDOT

MassDOT’s youMove Massachusetts project team seeks to learn about the transportation challenges individuals faced on a daily basis to develop a system of priorities for transportation system investments.

They’ve developed an online questionnaire (available in English, Spanish, Haitian Creole and Portuguese) as well as an  interactive map (available in Spanish and English) to pinpoint a specific issue or need.  Give them your feedback so we can improve the transportation system throughout the state.

State Looks at Grounding McGrath

The Massachusetts Department of Transportation convened a working group to re-evaluate the future of the Route 28 corridor. The vast swath of heavy traffic, loud and clamoring, intimidating to pedestrians, bicyclists and it seems any bit of creeping nature (not even a green median strip to enliven this highway) — maybe it doesn’t need to remain this way?

(Route 28 begins in Boston, in the Old West End, where Storrow Drive connects with Route 93. Locals know it for the signs that say, “If you lived here you’d be home now.”  It passes the Museum of Science, under the tracks by Lechmere, crosses Washington Street on the edge of Union Square, then sweeps down to cross Broadway by Foss Park, crosses the Mystic River into Medford and Malden, before turning west to connect with Route 93 before the Fells. The study focuses on the Somerville portions of 28, roughly from Lechmere to Broadway.)

For the intersection of McGrath with Washington Street, the overpass presents a conundrum.  The structure is crumbling and while some immediate repairs are necessary for safety, maybe, instead of rebuilding it, we can do something different with those millions of dollars?

The group is looking at how McGrath might be “grounded” – that overpass brought down to earth – so that what is now a space for pigeon poop, potholes, and falling cement might have sunshine with safe, pleasant passage for all modes of transport – vehicles, bikes, and pedestrians.

The idea is a new urban boulevard.  You can check out the powerpoint presentation that includes lots of good maps and study details on Route 28.

Greenline Construction Phase I Planning Meeting

From the Greenline Planning Team

“A corridor-wide public meeting has been scheduled on Wednesday, January 25th from 6:00pm to 8:00 pm to present the scope of work for the Green Line Extension Phase I Early Bridge & Demolition Contract Scope of Work which is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2012 with the reconstruction and widening of the Harvard Street Rail Bridge in Medford, the Medford Street Rail Bridge in Somerville, and the demolition of an MBTA owned property at 21 Water Street in Cambridge.

The meeting will be held at the Somerville High School Auditorium, located at 81 Highland Avenue, Somerville, MA. The high school can be reached via MBTA bus routes 88 and 90. Parking is available at the high school along with on-street parking on Highland Avenue and adjacent streets. Accessible parking is available next to the building. For language or access accommodations, please contact Beverley Johnson at (617) 438-2767 or bjohnson@bevcoassociates.comcastbiz.net at least one week before the event.”

Does MassDOT Have a Credibility Crisis?

Steve Miller of Livable Streets wrote another great blog post, this one reflecting on three major roadways: Casey Overpass, McGrath Highway and Rutherford Avenue, referred to by Steve as the “Three Sisters” as all are three crumbling structures are under intense revisioning.  Two of these serve Union Square:  McGrath Highway abutting Union Square and Rutherford Avenue just down Washington Street near Sullivan Square.

Image from Utile study on the de-elevation of McGrath Highway.

Efforts to re-conceive these areas as less vehicle focused has gotten some unexpected push back.  While residents wish for “complete streets” where bicycles and pedestrians, trees and an active streetscape are present along with vehicle traffic, there’s been skepticism that these roads, presently gritty, congested with traffic and desolate, can be anything other than  ugly pass-throughs. The presentations by planners of a better future are tough for some to believe.  Here’s the intro to Steve’s piece:

“The Casey Overpass and the McGrath/O’Brien Highway are on two ends of the Boston area. But what happens to each of them (as well as with Rutherford Avenue in Charlestown) will set a pattern for years to come about how MassDOT deals with the public and how much the public will be able to affect MassDOT. Will MassDOT invest in extensive community input processes? Will community-oriented transportation advocates be able to present a united front against those who want to maintain the car-centric designs of our transportation system? The stakes are high….

This post was meant to be about three of the old highways now falling down and the increasingly bitter policy disagreements within nearby communities over what to do about it. But as I thought more about these debates, it became clear that a significant secondary theme is that so few people trust the traffic engineers or their organizations – starting with total lack of belief in the validity of the traffic prediction models being used by MassDOT. The models feel like such opaque black boxes of unknown facts and hidden formulas that they simply feel like fantasy projections of agency desires – and there is little trust of those desires either. Applauding the projections that support one’s position and denouncing the rest is neither useful, logical, nor fair. The problem is that without analysis it’s all guesswork and power plays, which is not likely to end up creating optimal outcomes either.

The distrust is so deep that people are throwing the baby out with the bathwater – refusing to accept that the models’ results have any usefulness, even in situations where they actually can help compare alternatives.

The three projects each involve analysis of comparisons, and in comparison situations it doesn’t matter if the numbers are wildly inaccurate – each alternative will be distorted in the same manner giving some legitimacy to the analysis of the differences, if any, between the options. Maybe it is a local result of public disgust at the Big Dig. Maybe it’s that American culture is simply anti-government, a tendency the Tea Party car worshipers have successfully tapped. Maybe it’s that we’re in the middle of several levels of global transition from the automobile age into something else, and Transportation Departments around the world still represent so much of the archaic and destructive past practices. Whatever…. The sad result is that MassDOT’s efforts to open up the public process all the way back to the conceptual stage – at least in locations where advocates are active and vocal – have degenerated into shouting matches between the already-convinced partisans.

The danger is that we become so divided that we seem to have lost our collective ability to push past those with a stake in maintaining the car-centric past; that we end up spending hundreds of millions of dollars – and ultimately billions of dollars – recreating the roads that we already know will not carry us into a better future. Former Secretary of Transportation Jeff Mullan once said that in addition to creating one agency out of the five that were pushed together as part of transportation reform, one of MassDOT’s key challenges is regaining the trust of the public. The merger has happened. MassDOT has shown a new openness and ability to be innovative in both construction and operations, saving money while improving performance. There is, of course, more to do – perhaps finding ways to open the black box of prediction and decision-making should be next.

Read the rest of the post.